Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 9301 - 9320 of 14,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm by Adam Feldman
Although there was a drop off in such cases for the 2017 term, the court heard several salient patent cases last term as well, with Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 7:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
She states that on April 3, 2012, strong storms and tornadoes in North Texas caused severe damage to her home. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
  Substantially larger stakes were held in foreign equities from developed states (almost 25%) and developing states (about 9%). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
The Board stated that there was an ‘enormous difference’ between an agreement regulating a state of affairs between married couples (a postnup) and an agreement purporting to regulate an uncertain marital future (a prenup). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm by Florian Mueller
Patently-O also analyzed two decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that came down yesterday and relate to attorney fee-shifting in patent litigation: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am by Kevin Russell
This happened a few terms ago in Visa Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Tuesday on Black, Boultbee and Kipnis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am by Eric Goldman
While there is no denying that states have a strong interest in countering newly emerging threats to their elections, the approaches they choose to take must not encroach on First Amendment freedoms that are the hallmark of our nation. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]