Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9301 - 9320 of 14,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
“This is another example of close cooperation between the department’s Antitrust Division and state antitrust officials resulting in an outcome that protects competition and benefits consumers,” Acting Assistant Attorney General Pozen added.The text of the proposed final judgment in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[In a phone call], Elder Van Donselaar stated, "Edouard is more repentant than any of the women will ever be. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:49 am by Gmlevine
The Panel noted that Complainant “is …. recognized as the owner of a family of R US marks under the United States trademark law. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 1:47 pm by Trey Childress
  The Alien Tort Statute provides US district courts with original jurisdiction over “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:04 am by J
The various “lockdown” regulations have closed certain businesses and not paid compensation to anyone. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Dru Stevenson
A public outcry erupted over this mass shooting and the NRA’s central role in promoting weapons proliferation in the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
(IP finance) United States US General Corporate Counsel Magazine includes ALJ Luckern on its list of The 25 Most Influential People in IP (ITC Law Blog) US Patent Reform Patent Reform not dead yet (Inventive Step) Senators seek vote on Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) (271 Patent Blog) (IPKat) Recent bipartisan patent reform push just smoke? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Greenhouse writes:It has been nearly three months since the court “invited” — that is to say, ordered — Solicitor General Elena Kagan to “express the views of the United States” on whether laws that take away the right to vote from people in prison or on parole can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act as racially discriminatory.The order came in a case from Massachusetts, Simmons v. [read post]