Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 9301 - 9320 of 16,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
Press Gazette, The FT, the Guardian, Sky News, BBC, and the New York Times covered the ruling. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Donovan, and Timothy QuintanillaCase number: 12-cv-08167 (United States District Court for the Southern District Court of New York)Case filed: November 8, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 8, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-132 SEC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:18 pm by Guest Author
” The United States Congress obtained FTC staff e-mails elaborating on — and expressed concern about — this losing strategy. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:03 pm by Danielle Beach-Oswald
  The opinion piece in the New York Times was based on Judulang v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:06 pm
   In March 2007, Viacom sued YouTube and Google, Inc. in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, seeking at least $1 billion in damages for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:25 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 2000d ("Title VI"), as well as under New York State and New York City human rights laws. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:09 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Now marketed as the superluxury boutique condominium complex 66 Reade, the historic building and its cast iron columns evoke the most stately parts of New York City’s architectural polish. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
Briefly: At the New York Times, Kate Murphy interviews Paul Clement about his favorite movies, blogs, and brand of cycling shorts. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:59 am by Kish Law
 As a respected Senior Judge in New York wrote in the opening lines of his decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Maldonado v DiBre, 140 AD3d 1501 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 908 [2016] [“even if, as plaintiffs claim, the loss of the units was not voluntary, they still would not have standing to pursue derivative claims”]). [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Some answers are set forth in   NADA, -against- 1199 SEIU HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION, 09 Civ. 5796 (SAS);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]