Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 33,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
Facebook moved to dismiss the lawsuit on the merits and based on the terms of service’s choice of law provision, which said California law governed (since California does not have a biometric privacy act, this would mean plaintiffs could not maintain their claims). [read post]
23 May 2010, 12:36 pm
A recent Delaware case, Baker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
Mark V. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
As such they fall within the "Garmon" preemption doctrine.Although the court in Luke did not even cite the court of appeal's decision in Grant-Burton v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 11:24 pm
In a recent case handed down by the California Supreme Court entitled North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
United States President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, is discontinuing his defamation actions against Fusion GPS and Buzzfeed arising out of the infamous “Steele Dossier” Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has a number of posts including: An analysis of the approval of net neutrality laws in California and considers the practical legislative implications. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:41 pm
The latest illustration of that principle comes from the California Supreme Court’s December 22, 2016 opinion in Augustus v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:57 pm
In a recent and surprising decision favorable to California employers in Arechiga v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm
Newsom v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 12:15 am
Chesney illustrates why privity is important when bringing suit under the California Corporate Securities Law. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:46 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Ellis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
The California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
The California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:23 pm
Here is a list of five items employers should understand about on-call time under California law. 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
And yet, in Caron v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:36 am
See Choyce v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
California, this can be a problem of constitutional dimension. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 pm
Fried, was entered on July 23, 2010 in the matter of Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:40 am
Case citation: Real v. [read post]
