Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
The legislative intent of §36, said the court, was “to enable a town or village to rid itself of an unfaithful or dishonest public official," citing Matter of Miller v Filion, 304 AD2d 1016.In the words of the court, “It is firmly established that removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 is unwarranted in the absence of allegations of "self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
This is a big deal. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:40 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:59 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:39 am
Much like the case of Real Color Displays, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:17 am
That case was Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:50 am
In Conner v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:31 am
Will the decision in Raess v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:25 am
In Swezey v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:00 pm
MHL Tek, LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Supreme Court today took up for full briefing and argument the case of Welch v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:09 am
I have previously posted on this blog about the residuum rule, pursuant to which factual findings at an administrative hearing cannot be exclusively based on hearsay. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:15 am
Like its federal counterpart, Michigan Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony... [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:28 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, North Dakota Rule of Evidence 804(b)(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for (4) Statement of Personal or Family History. [read post]
Opinion Of Interest: Eleventh Circuit Affirmed Statement Against Interest Ruling In Drug Deal Appeal
22 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject... [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Susan Green’s testimony regarding use of the “friends and family” deal does not indicate that it was necessarily an insider deal. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Kulch v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
It might be otherwise if we were only dealing with prudential standing. [read post]
