Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 11,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 8:07 pm
Hartley expressed his views on the case and explained new strategies developed under English law to protect the effects of choice of court agreements, like the one shown in AMT Futures Limited v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court in a landmark 1968 decision, Terry v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm
" Hyatt v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am
Tessa has always taken a ‘plain english’ approach to explaining the law, even very complex law, and as well as providing a valued service for her members, has really been a model of public legal education in that regard. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
" (TTABlogged here).CDS, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Misuse of Private Information in English Law, Apostolos Pelekanos, University of Sussex [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 5:46 am
The case, filed January 22, 2006, is entitled Walker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:52 am
In Douez v Facebook, Inc., 2017 SCC 33 (available here) the Supreme Court of Canada confirms the second of these points: the analysis is indeed separate. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:50 am
In the case of Kendrick v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
The EU Withdrawal Bill will determine the extent to which English courts will follow, or be bound to follow, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the post-Brexit era for retained legislation (like GDPR). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
A question on communication to the public has been referred by the English court to the CJEU. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
That premise seems just slightly undermined by Clinton v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:45 am
It was Palsgraf v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:39 am
State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:26 pm
At the outset, it is observed that choice of law considerations are relegated to a secondary position in international civil and commercial litigation before the English courts as compared to international jurisdictional and procedural issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:19 am
” The court also pointed out that in its Montells v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am
The supervisor called her “stupid,” disparaged her appearance, and mocked her English-speaking capabilities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Furthermore, the Romanian procedure cannot be considered compatible with EU law, as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights X. and Y. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:52 am
Second, the drafting history of the convention, as previously described by the Supreme Court in 1988, in Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
