Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 12:06 am
District Court for the District of Delaware, granting summary judgment in favor of an employer against a plaintiff that made claims based on the ADA and FMLA.In Pagonakis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
[is] not liable . . . if (1) the warnings or information that accompanied the product in its distribution were those approved by the United State Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
Further, CRS posits that to "reduce the burden imposed by a testing requirement, Congress might allow manufacturers to share test data (and costs of testing), grant exclusive production or marketing rights within the United States for a number of years to manufacturers who conduct testing (to compensate them for their expenditures), or exempt particular categories of products or manufacturers from requirements. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 8:48 pm
Last year, on interlocutory appeal in State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
And those who are intratextually minded are likely to consider the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides:"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
Circuit stated in Jones v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:21 am
" The article, called "Who Can Be President of the United States: The Unresolved Enigma," was written in 1968 by Charles Gordon, then General Counsel of the INS and an adjunct law professor at Georgetown. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:54 pm
The ex-wife suffered from Lupus, had sustained two strokes, and was determined to be disabled by the United States Social Security Administration. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
City of Oklahoma, 816 F.2d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1987), alleging a right of privacy under the Florida state constitution and the United States Constitution; Brashear v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:38 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that the context of the remark should be considered. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
In the seminal United States Supreme Court decision interpreting the predecessor of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:33 am
Security National Guaranty v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
In Wallace, the plaintiff, an injured elderly citizen of the United States, had claimed special damages reflecting medical? [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
In the present case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The new appeal is Gates v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:38 pm
Leal Santos v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:47 am
A new decision is out from CAAF today: United States v. [read post]
