Search for: "v. Park" Results 9321 - 9340 of 17,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC attorney Dana Frix of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives What do Clients Feel about the NSA Evesdropping on Attorney-Client Phone Conversations? [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Newhall Ranch Specific Plan (the specific plan) On May 27, 2003, the County of Los Angeles approved the Newhall Ranch “specific plan” that includes a broad range of residential, mixed-use and non-residential land uses within five villages, allowing for up to 21,308 dwelling units (including 423 second units), 629 acres of mixed-use development, 67 acres of commercial uses, 249 acres of business park land uses, 37 acres of visitor-serving uses, 1,014 acres of open space,… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:22 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana trademark attorney for Noble Roman's, Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Sahara Sam's Indoor Water Park, LLC of Pennsauken, New Jersey ("Sahara") infringed its trademarks. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Patricia Salkin
Scott v City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2014 WL 1133286 (PA Commnwlth 3/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-commonwealth-court/1661096.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:27 pm
Fortunately, the recent case of Market Lofts Community Association v. 9th Street Market Lofts, LLC (2014) 222 Cal. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:59 pm by Jon Gelman
The Court ruled that the NJ 1979 Legislative amendments mandate that the "coming and going" rule bars such a workers' compensation claim when an employee is injured on a public street while walking to and from a public parking lot.The Court held that even though the employer provided a parking pass to the employee to park in the public lot, that since the employer did not own, maintain or exercise control over the lot nor the route that the employee must take in commuting… [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
In McDonald v Asset Acceptance it was held that a third party debt buyer (Asset Acceptance and Cavalry are very similar in this respect) may not charge interest for the period of time post charge off. [read post]