Search for: "B. R." Results 9341 - 9360 of 55,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 2:14 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
While we do appreciate the increased average speed of the proceedings, such an overreaching desire for high productivity has led to the following, specific problems regarding the examination of patents: a) When the aim is to terminate proceedings as quickly as possible within specific allowed times, the quality of the search and examination of applications must suffer. b) The fees for search and examination, which are rather high when compared internationally, can only be justified by… [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 3:26 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms M brought a s.204(1)(b) appeal in the county court, which is against the original s.184 decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:52 am by Michael Geist
Over a two week period, the committee heard from one artist appearing on his own behalf and 17 copyright collectives, publishers, rights management companies, and other music associations: Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada Canadian Independent Music Association ole Society for Reproduction Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers in Canada Artisti Association québécoise de l’industrie du disque, du spectacle et de la vidéo (ADISQ)… [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Recent disciplinary findings and penalty recommendations of OATH Administrative Law JudgesSource: New York City Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsEmployee's "whistleblower defense" rejected by Administrative Law JudgeOATH Index No. 1883/17 A New York City claims examiner raised a Civil Service Law §75-b whistleblower defense to misconduct charges filed against the individual Administrative Law Judge Noel R. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d at 65) Because SAi claims that “[b]ut for Furgang’s2 departure from the ordinary standards of professional conduct, SAi would … have [saved] more than $300,000 in legal fees”, SAi states that “‘but for’ [F&A’s] negligence[,] [SAi] … would not have sustained ‘actual and ascertainable’ damages. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:45 am by Steve Brachmann
§ 1400(b)) meant that domestic companies could only file patent infringement suits in the judicial district where they were incorporated. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:22 pm by News Desk
J Bar B Foods of  Waelder, TX, is recalling more than 410,000 pounds of H-E-B brand beef brisket smoked sausage because of an adulterated and misbranded ingredient, according to  the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:51 am by Andrée Blais
  The revenues generated by the project are the payments from LAWA to Developer under the terms of the project agreement, comprised of (a) five Milestone Payments, together with certain additional D&C payments, paid by LAWA during the construction period and a sixth Milestone Payment paid after final completion; and (b) “availability payments” that commence when the APM system is available for passenger service and continue through the operations and maintenance period.… [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:07 am by Suzan Kern
Matter of A-B- was originally decided, in December 2016, in favor of the asylum seeker by the Board of Immigration Appeals. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Nonetheless, the lower court concluded that the response was inadequate and dismissed, agreeing with the defendant’s argument that the issue was “conceded” under Local Rule 7(b). [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
(b) From my understanding I cannot serve the Tenants a Section 21 notice until 2 months before the end of their AST – almost 10 months away. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
(b) From my understanding I cannot serve the Tenants a Section 21 notice until 2 months before the end of their AST – almost 10 months away. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:18 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In his decision, dated June 11, 2018, the Attorney General overruled a separate but similar decision in Matter of A-R-C-G-, stating that the case was “wrongly decided” by the appellate court and should not have become precedent. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006 states:- “Execution of documents:- (1) Under the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland a document is executed by a company— (a) by the affixing of its common seal, or (b) by signature in accordance with the following provisions. (2) A document is validly executed by a company if it is signed on behalf of the company— (a) by two authorised signatories, or (b) by a director of the company in the presence of a witness who… [read post]