Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 9341 - 9360 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm by Sandy
The Court stated: "What the law's legal construct of a reasonable person would believe or do under the particular circumstances of a case is normally a question of law, the decision of which is reviewed de novo.The decision in Huang v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Search and Seizure Body: Below is today's Search and Seizure Appellate Court opinion: AC31959 - State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:38 am
Generally, the proponent must meet its burden to show the "(1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
The petition of the day is: Alpha Delta Chi-Delta Chapter v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
The case was remanded to the Benefits Review Board for fact-finding regarding the allocation of the petitioner's prior state settlement between death benefits and disability benefits, noting that the burden of proof would be on the party asserting the credit.The decision in Barscz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:30 am by John Diekman
Plaintiff's burden of proof on this issue is satisfied if the possibility of another explanation for the event is sufficiently remote or technical to enable the jury to reach its verdict based not upon speculation, but upon the logical inferences to be drawn from the evidence.Case: Cesar Ivan A. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:02 pm
Category: Recent Decisions;Land Use Opinions Body: Below is today's land use law Appellate Court opinion: AC30440 - Piquet v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:47 am by Rick Hasen
We should subject this law to strict scrutiny—or at least, in the wake of Burdick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:52 am by The Docket Navigator
The case is so near completion, however, that the Court finds that continued representation by [defense counsel] does not constitute not an 'unreasonable burden.'" The Walman Optical Company v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:34 am
I said I thought he would not, at least not in its later, less absolute version embodied in the 1992 Casey decision, which protected against governments imposing an "undue burden" on a woman's right to choose abortion before the fetus's viability. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
The petition of the day is: Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]