Search for: "In re Doe" Results 9341 - 9360 of 107,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm
In this case, "John Doe" had been previously convicted of Massachusetts Sex Crimes, and the Sex Offender Registry Board argued that, even at his age of 65, his criminal history and suggested a "high risk of re-offense and high degree of danger. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:26 am by Stephen Honig
Although the appeal addresses only the securities fraud convictions (seemingly it is clear that defendants re-hacked), the appeal does raise the issue that, by extension, the court reasoning could support a conviction in virtually every case where someone obtains inside information by virtually any means, however removed that person is from the company, tippees, buyers, sellers, anyone. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm by PascoDUI
If you too have been charged with DUI in Florida, you’re going to need a lawyer. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:56 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  Does it relate to a question on which all claims would necessarily fail (individual and class) if the “common” evidence does not persuade the finder of fact? [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:11 am by Bill White
The Dean's approach sounds completely reasonable (although we're not sure what numbers he used). [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:44 pm by Corynne McSherry
We're taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Trademark applications pending in the EU post-Brexit would need to re-file in the UK within 9 months, and the UK intellectual property office has agreed to recognize the EU filing date for priority purposes. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:03 pm
They’re letting people see Microsoft for the bumps and bruises it has, as well as the stuff it does really well. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:15 am by Elie Mystal
Re: “Is health-care reform constitutional? [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:19 am by Cari Rincker
Just because one spouse acquired a business interest before the marriage does not mean that it, or part of it, is not going to be considered marital property. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:57 am
First, law does not stand alone — it only operates in connection with specific activities. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
I wish it weren’t true that more expensive meant better, but often it does. [read post]