Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 9341 - 9360 of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
It further requires that “[t]he tabulation of total population by States … as required for the apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States shall be completed within 9 months after the census date and reported by the Secretary to the President of the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Q3mYPY (Dennis Kiker) States Enacting Rules on Use of Electronic Data in Medical Liability Cases – http://bit.ly/NztMYc (IHealthBeat) Technology Review: A FrameWork for Managing People, Technology and Processes - http://bit.ly/NrQlhv (Lynn Frances) Tips for Identifying and Preserving ESI – http://bit.ly/OXF9Xj (James Bernard, Michael Quartararo, Jason Vinokur) Twitter Contempt Sanctions Increase Need for Social Media Governance Plan… [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
” One can still read the Missouri statute, plausibly, to make his behavior a crime.In a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]