Search for: "R. G." Results 9341 - 9360 of 22,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 1:55 pm by PaulKostro
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Deux articles récents traitent de la question des priorités multiples, c'est-à-dire de la possibilité pour une même revendication de bénéficier de dates différentes. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:17 pm by Tamsen Barrett (US)
Marks that may be considered a trademark include those that are: Suggestive: indicate a product’s nature, quality, or characteristic without describing the product (g., “Airbus” for airplanes); Arbitrary: common words used in a meaningless context (g., “Camel” for cigarettes); or Fanciful: words with no meaning prior to use (g., “Xerox”). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Consumers can use the following information to identify the implicated salmon:     Brand Name Common Name Size Code(s) on Product UPC Monsieur ÉmileSmokehouse Smoked Salmon 70 g “Meilleur avant” 03/10/18 (26218) “Meilleur avant” 05/10/18 (26418) “Meilleur avant” 08/10/18 (26718) None Monsieur ÉmileSmokehouse Smoked Salmon 85 g “Meilleur avant” 03/10/18 (26218) “Meilleur avant” 04/10/18 (26318)… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:27 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Earlier, in the decisions G2/12 and G 2/13 of 2015, the Enlarged Board of Appeal had ruled that certain tomatoes and broccoli were patentable. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
The Interference Issues Luckily for Inventor B, the CIP application still will be subject to current §§ 102(g), 135 and 291. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:10 pm by Cicely Wilson
Determining that plaintiff had standing to challenge section 613.10(g), the court concluded that section 613.10(g) is a reasonable fit to achieve its goal of reducing the legality of ammunition, and section 613.10(g) thus satisfies intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
The Interference Issues Luckily for Inventor B, the CIP application still will be subject to current §§ 102(g), 135 and 291. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus
” As a result, the NAD recommended that P&G modify its advertising to avoid making these unsubstantiated claims. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by News Desk
” Consumers should not consume the following recalled products: Culinary Creations Gourmet Beef and Cheese on Onion Bun, 190 g, Best Before “AL 16″ or “AL 23″ and the UPC number 6 89069 18085 6;  Culinary Creations Gourmet Roast Beef Sandwich, 155 g, Best Before AL 16 or AL 23 with the UPC number 6 89069 18093 1;  Culinary Creations Gourmet Jumbo Beef & Swiss… [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:58 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The County was not compelled to use CEQA’s Appendix G thresholds, nor was it obligated to explain why it elected to not use Appendix G thresholds, nor was it obligated to formally adopt the alternative threshold. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:55 am by Siobhan Hayes
Some occupiers will not take leases with EPC ratings of F and G already. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:55 am by Siobhan Hayes
Some occupiers will not take leases with EPC ratings of F and G already. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by Tom Webley
The items which no longer require a license for reexport are those classified under the following ECCNs: 2A994, 3A992.a, 5A991.g, 5A992, 5D992.b or .c, 6A991, 6A998, 7A994, 8A992.d, .e, .f, and .g, 9A990.a and .b, and 9A991.d and .e. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Proof of claim shall not be complete until the information which has been requested pursuant thereto has been furnished to the insurer in accordance with 11 NYCRR § 65-3.8[g]. [read post]