Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9341 - 9360
of 28,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 3:25 am
However, finding that it was reasonable for her employer not to permit a return to court-going duties, the tribunal stated that it was understood that “reinstatement would be to a non-court-going fingerprint officer role”. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:48 am
§ 922(g)(9) in light of District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments from Eric] Woods v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 12:27 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:49 pm
Locke v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:43 am
Harding and State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 2:01 pm
By Jason Rantanen Trustees of Boston University v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 6:57 am
This despite a SC decision in Prakash Singh Badal v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:36 am
v=C_ICw9DZlIw, a member of the Project stated that, if this appeal were denied, they would appeal to the Court of Appeals where they believe Judge Fahey is aligned with the Project’s position. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:34 am
As articulated in our new strategic plan, our public protection mission is the guiding light for all that we do. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 10:01 am
The verdict, both as to liability and the amount of damages, has now been affirmed in Simmons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 8:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order in the ongoing case Viacom International Inc. et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:21 am
In the March 14 ruling Romspen Investment Corp. v. 6176666 Canada Ltée., Brown unleashed his frustration regarding the lack of technology in Ontario courts. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:03 am
” One such paper – Deconstructing the Myth of Careful Study: A Primer on the Flawed Progression of the Child Pornography Guidelines (January 1, 2009) by Troy Stabenow – is the likely impetus behind a notable decision from the Second Circuit issued yesterday: United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 7:35 am
As stated above, the proposed amendments in the NPRM seek to address these exemptions. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:09 am
Grim v Maxatawney Township Board of Supervisors, 2023 WL 2799447 (PA Cmwlth 4/6/2023) [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
