Search for: "State v. Person" Results 9341 - 9360 of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2008, 6:46 pm
As noted in posts in this Kennedy case archive, the Supreme Court later this term will hear Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
In Reklos v Greece ([2009] ECHR 200). the Court stated that while the right to control the use of one’s image generally involves the possibility of refusing publication, “it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction” of that image. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:05 am by Bridget Crawford
Lenahan’s constitutional rights had not been violated because individuals do not have personal entitlement to police enforcement of a protective order. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 2:32 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Floridians, like residents in every state, are acutely aware “of the terrible toll taken, both in personal injuries and property damage, by drivers who mix alcohol and gasoline,” Ontiveros v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
If one of the three, unable to subdue with his fists the (seemingly quite powerful) one, then decides to shoot and kill the person who resists, are all three guilty of murder, or just the one? [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 Steven reports:  "Kitchin J (as he was then)’s decision in Edwards v Cook [2009] FSR 27 established the proposition that in order to claim priority, a patentee must be the “person” who filed the application from which priority is claimed or that “person’s” successor in title at the date of filing of the later application, i.e. it is not possible to retrospectively correct the position. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Werner v. 1281 King Associates, LLC, No. 1725 MDA 2023 (Pa. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am by INFORRM
The ECJ today handed down a case in a landmark decision regarding data protection and the Internet (Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am by Steven M. Sweat
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:35 am by Fenella Keymer, Olswang LLP
  The contract expressly stated that the relationship between Autoclenz and the valeters was one of client and independent contractor. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am by Susan Brenner
Texas, 2000 WL 1835396 *2 (Texas Court of Appeals 2000) (`officer's affidavit stated appellant's windshield had a crack in it. [read post]