Search for: "State v. Word" Results 9341 - 9360 of 40,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 4:04 am
However, the Syndicate pointed out that that notional responsibility was not stated on the face of the 1886 Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
 You lack the requisite mental state in both cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:55 am by assoulineberlowe
“Sticks and stones will break my bones … but words will (also) hurt me (and my survivors)! [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
2 May 2010, 5:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Boyer of the Venango County Court of Common Pleas recently issued an April 24, 2010 Opinion and Order in the case of Heller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"[A] court cannot amend a statute by inserting words that are not there, nor will a court read into a statute a provision which the Legislature did not see fit to enact. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:20 am by Terry Hart
(Or, as Lee Gesmer states it, “Filtration for interoperability should be performed ex ante, not ex post. [read post]