Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 9341 - 9360 of 13,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Because such a justification for the carve-outs “would not survive even rational basis scrutiny,” the employers plausibly pleaded an equal protection violation, held the appeals court, reversing in relevant part and remanding in an opinion that supplies the reasoning behind a December 9 order (Fowler Packing Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether the Court of Appeal erred (i) in its approach to international materials and (ii) by failing to apply a ‘strict necessity’ test when determining whether the Respondent’s treatment of the Appellant during the first 55 days of his detention at Feltham Young Offenders’ Institution breached Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:13 am by Thomas J. Bean
In reaching this decision, the Federal Circuit interpreted and affirmed a ruling made by its predessor court, the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) in In re Doll. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
There is no appeal from that conclusion. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:18 am by Kaitlyn E. Stone and Jennifer P. Smith
Concerning the former, the Appellate Division affirmed, consistent with the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Toll Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm by Robert Wagner
As the case was winding its way through the courts, the Federal Circuit heard an appeal in an unrelated case Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
United States, 517 F.3d 1319, 1330-31 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am by Audrey A Millemann
Prometheus  Laboratories, Inc., 132 S.Ct. 1289 (2012). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am by Peter J. Dugan
IBP, Inc., 299 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2003), which found that “special protective gear” such as that donned and doffed by the workers at U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
He refused leave to appeal on the basis of his view on the case". [read post]