Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 9341 - 9360 of 44,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 11:33 am by Montgomery McCracken
The district court agreed, concluding that based on relevant precedents from the United States Supreme Court (in Clapper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Although Section 4302(b) of the statute does contain a provision that states that the law "supersedes any state law . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 2:14 pm by Gene Quinn
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in ncCUBE Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
By Audrey MillemannThe first case the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has decided under obviousness since the United States Supreme Court’s decision on April 30, 2007 in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm by Miriam Seifter
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In December 2012, there were 326 million mobile subscriber connections in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
  Regardless of whether you are dealing with Federal or State laws, the United States and the Insurance Carriers are entitled to receive recovery based on the applicable law. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:19 am by James Rusk and Keith Garner
A recent Ninth Circuit ruling that pollutants reaching waters of the United States through groundwater may trigger Clean Water Act liability has prompted the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:19 am by James Rusk and Keith Garner
A recent Ninth Circuit ruling that pollutants reaching waters of the United States through groundwater may trigger Clean Water Act liability has prompted the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
Coca-Cola does not use the LIMCA mark in the US and its use of THUMS UP in the United States is limited. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
Coca-Cola does not use the LIMCA mark in the US and its use of THUMS UP in the United States is limited. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court in McAllen, Texas, issued a ruling on September 17, 2013, in the case styled, Guerrero Investments LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
As Berg’s claim does not arise from commercial activity by defendants in the United States, the only applicable exception to sovereign immunity under the FSIA is the expropriation exception found in 28 U.S.C. [read post]