Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 9341 - 9360 of 10,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
§ 713 (United States, President, Vice President, Senate, House of Representatives and Congress); 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:53 am
 The registration resulting from such applications may be subject to cancellation if the mark is not in use in the United States with each and every good or service listed in the application. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Google changes trade mark policy: lets advertisers buy rivals’ trade marks as keywords in 194 countries (Out-Law) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google and the value of brand advertising (IP finance) Nokia and iPhone; strong, famous and hip? [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA's backward step: Re-focus on "protecting, preserving and promoting" structured settlement laws already enacted in the United States Internal Revenue Code and 47 state structured settlement protection statutes; Consolidate and transition NSSTA's administrative, financial and political strengths. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Justice Jackson made this point in a barb at Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia State Bd of Educ. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am by Terese Arenth
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
United States Plywood laid down what has become the case law bible for assessing damages, listing 15 factors for consideration in assessing damages--, note that the 1970 decision is a district court decision [ 318 F. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
Furthermore, while Section 44 was “generally intended” to implement elements of the Paris Convention, In re Rath, 402 F.3d at 1207, 74 USPQ2d at 1177, it does not, through subsections 44(b) or (h) or otherwise, provide the user of an assertedly famous foreign trademark with an independent basis for cancellation in a Board proceeding, absent use of the mark in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline)   Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor)   Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP)   Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:43 am
However, prior to Dauben’s positive verdict, Southern filed its claim in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:56 pm
Mark Levy was well known and highly respected for his successful appearances before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeDefendant Lacks Sixth Amendment Right to Jury Instruction on Mandatory Minimum Sentence United States, appellee-cross-appellant v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
The Lanham Trademark Act (title 15, chapter 22 of the United States Code) is legislation that contains the federal statutes of trademark law in the United States. [read post]