Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 11,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
Read more: Update 17/06/10 – Louise Blom Cooper writing in the Guardian: The Royal Commission on Tribunals of Inquiry under the chairmanship of Lord Salmon recommended that some of the procedural safeguards of the legal system should apply to public inquiries… The Salmon recommendations were never enacted, but the practice, until the Scott inquiry on arms to Iraq over four years in the mid-1990s, has been to adopt the legalisms of L [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
In Pearson Education v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
”Judge Woodard’s decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/pdfs/2010/2010_31420.pdfThe decision is Bolin v Nassau County Board of Cooperative Education Services 52 AD3d 704 is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_05692.htm [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In the procedural challenge, the claimant bank relied on a long line of authority, from Cooper v Wandsworth Board of Works [1863] 14 CB (NS) 180 to R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody [1994] 1 AC 531, to assert the well established principle that natural justice will in many cases require that a person likely to be adversely affected by an administrative decision must be given an opportunity to make representations on his own behalf before it is… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:02 am
In TVT Records v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 6:04 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:48 pm
Toxics Coal. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
Cooper, 151 N.J. 326 (1997) - overruled State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
The second sample was also "out of range" and Gluck left the laboratory.SCCC argued that Gluck's failure to provide a witness-validated urine sample constituted a failure to cooperate with the sample collection procedure. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:28 am
In Plouffe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:56 am
[Post by Venkat] Barnes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
Berghuis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
” Separate Counsel for Constituents “What if I refuse to cooperate in this investigation? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
Out-of-title work Article 78 petition dismissed for failure to exhaust remedy provided in the collective bargaining agreementCSEA v Groton Cent. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
In the first, Cooper Cameron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
