Search for: "California Law Review" Results 9361 - 9380 of 29,166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  In reaching this conclusion, I have relied on, among other things, Richard Cahn’s review of A Wilderness of Error in the Touro Law Review. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 10:25 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfAs advertised here on the blog a week ago, yesterday I participated in the Practicing Law Institute full-day conference reviewing the last Supreme Court Term. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm by Donna Bader
ORD-10-0007 (Ordinance No. 10-0007), imposing a regulatory permit scheme for the lawful operation of medical marijuana collectives in the city, was preempted by the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:09 am
Several interesting 2010 wrap-ups summarizing news, issues and trends in law firm risk management and ethics: [via Legal Ethics Forum] -- The Top Ten Legal Ethics Stories of 2010, based on reader input and editorial review. 2010 California Ethics Case Highlights, presented by the Orange County Bar Association, a review of issues "...from the attorney-client privilege to conflicts to supervision of paralegals. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:23 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:00 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
If you are a client of MVP Law Group and would like our assistance please contact our office. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:25 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:24 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  This is the Court's statement of issues on review: (1) Should California law recognize the “stray remarks” doctrine, which permits the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment to disregard isolated discriminatory remarks or comments unrelated to the decision-making process as insufficient to establish discrimination? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
If you filed a petition with one of the Service Centers, please review the links below to determine the applicable processing time associated with your particular case. [read post]