Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 12,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm
Although not persuaded at the moment to rename the defendant, Judge Waits does agree to look into whether Hadi had been deposed or took an oath in some type of federal proceeding using a different name in the past. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
United States, 19-7862Issues: (1) Whether, because the age at which a capital defendant became intellectually disabled does not bear on his moral culpability, the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
In this manner, the patent owner could include new claims, and defend the existing claims. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:19 pm
See Hunter v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
In the November 7 oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
An act does not cease to be a violation of a law and of a decree merely because it may have been done innocently. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:50 am
“The Only Rational Outcome” As noted at the top of this post, a sense of the lawsuit’s futility comes through in the court’s decision as well as in the transcript of oral argument (read here) where, after observing that the 225 Broadway partnership agreement does not allow dissolution of the limited partnership or limited partner withdrawal, Justice Kornreich challenged plaintiff’s counsel,… [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
I strongly suspect that if the panel that heard Missouri v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
With no objective in particular, this post and a number that follow provides my summary of the slice of 2019 to which I paid attention through epigrams and aphorisms. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
Enzymotec Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:45 am
” Frankly, I don’t understand that argument, either, and I’d give an analysis of the court’s more detailed explanation for it if the opinion had provided one. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Our system processes cases at a high volume and extending this right to defendants has not significantly retarded the ability to prosecute crime. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
Here I take no position on whether recent protect-the-speech-we-hate decisions like United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
To aid in thinking about this question, consider Grutter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:02 am
Papish v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
Admittedly, I am playing the role of the curmudgeon here by pointing out errors or confusions in the third edition of the Reference Manual. [read post]
