Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 61,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:32 am
The Court granted State Farm’s motion. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am
Here are the materials in Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:10 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:50 am
Google, Wilson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:31 pm
Tehan’s Catalog Showrooms, Inc. v State, 2014 WL 2782358 (NYAD 4 Dept. 6/20/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2014/760-ca-13-02096.html Filed under: Condemnation/Eminent Domain, Current Caselaw - New York [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 12:15 pm
And, to make matters worse, to say that the state can now refile those charges as a felony even though the California Supreme Court has said that "when a court has granted relief under section 17, subdivision (b), the offense is 'deemed a ‘misdemeanor for all purposes. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 7:43 am
Frlekin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:45 am
State. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
Schachter v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 1:13 pm
In J.D. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
The general approach had to be that courts should be “exceedingly slow” to grant an injunction to restrain publication where the applicant had not satisfied the court that he would probably, or “more likely than not”, succeed at trial (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44). [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:19 pm
See, e.g., McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:59 pm
The appeals court affirmed, addressing only three of the issues raised by Goodman: (1) whether the State prematurely released his vehicle after his first trial in violation of his due process rights and requiring dismissal under California v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:35 am
The court stated that Congress has expressly limited the role of states in regulating national banks "especially when such conduct involves the exercise of powers granted to the banks by federal statute and regulation . . . . [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:48 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:03 am
On January 23, 2025, in McHenry v. [read post]
