Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 37,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 1:58 am
However, in its ruling the Federal Patent Court comes to the conclusion that it does not matter whether the re-establishment of rights was correctly granted by the IPI or not. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:04 am
However, the court may consider the circumstances of the recipient before granting a modification. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am
Here are some excerpts from Tuesday’s gun decision (some paragraph breaks added), though if you’re interested in the topic, you should read the whole opinion: The Second Amendment’s Applicability Is Not Limited to the Home . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
” Under the agreement, the parties would re-evaluate in May 2017 to determine “a future agreement” and “plan” for the future. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
In re Medrano, 956 F.2d 101, 102 (5th Cir. 1992) (quoting Cruzan by Cruzan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Granted, any politician seeking re-election will examine any proposal in terms of its effect on re-election chances, but to try to sell that to Americans reveals the true intent of Moore and Kerpen, which is to get their hero re-elected. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
We're for it, and I have every hope we're going to get that up and running this year. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:33 pm
But when the Supreme Court granted review in Jack Daniel’s, the Ninth Circuit put enforcement of its decision on hold pending the outcome of this case. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:03 pm
Lenovo was granted U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:39 am
Re-establishment of rights at the EPO is only granted if the party can demonstrate that the loss of rights occurred despite "all due care" having been taken. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 8:20 am
Good that they're redeemed. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:52 am
These lawsuits don’t spur innovation—they’re just exercises in rent-seeking. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:03 pm
And while it’s fascinating in its way, we’re going to skip it. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 10:40 am
DONATE TO EFF Like what you're reading? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
They’re here and they’re ready to go. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:44 am
§ 704(a)(1); In re Moore, 608 F.3d 253, 263 (5th Cir. 2010); In re Atlanta Packaging Products, Inc., 99 B.R. 124 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:50 pm
(He's also liable for breach of contract, of course, but you're liable too -- and as a tort.)The trial court here granted summary judgment to the defendant, holding even though he was not a party to the contract, he wasn't a "stranger" to it because he "had an economic interest in it" and hence couldn't be liable for tortious interference. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:00 pm
They’re scared, too. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:03 am
The original BAYC NFT and the corresponding NFT of Ripps's are stored at two different IPFS addresses (which necessarily implies that BAYC original files have been copied and re-displayed). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:59 pm
I'll grant you that. [read post]
