Search for: "Mark"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 151,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2023, 4:10 am
It was because of her close friendship with Mark Sewell and because she was seeking to provide emotional support to him, and not because Mark Sewell had control over her as an elder, that Mrs B went to the back room. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 3:12 am
A TTAB judge once remarked that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:32 am
Examining Attorney Doritt Carroll refused registration of the mark BLUE IS THE NEW GREEN for "trade association services, namely, promoting the interests of Pennsylvania independent oil and natural gas producers, marketers, service companies and related businesses," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the identical mark, registered for "motor oils; lubricants for motor vehicles." [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:18 am
The later mark should not differ materially from the earlier mark to be tacked. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
You may recall that a TTAB judge once remarked that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:23 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark PALMS FREE for "universal phone holders and harnesses," deeming the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:29 am
Allard) [Section 2(d) refusal of word-and-design mark shown below left [FRESH and TO GO disclaimed] for, inter alia, "ready-to-eat meals comprised primarily of meats" and "coffee," in view of the registered marks FARMHOUSE for "Processed meats, namely pork, beef, and poultry," and the word-plus-design mark shown below left, for "Ground coffee beans; roasted coffee beans. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:22 am
Gorowitz) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark TROPICAL BLISS for kits for making wine, in view of the registered mark BLISS for wines]. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:35 am
Greenbaum) [Section 2(d) refusal of the word-plus-design mark shown below, for "beer," in view of the registered mark PAINTBOX for "alcoholic beverages except beers. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of RESISTOR for "boots," in view of two registered marks (depicted below) owned by different owners: the mark on the left for "Hoodies; T-shirts; Tank-tops” and the mark on the rights for"“Clothing, namely t-shirts, sweaters, sweat-shirts, shirts, pants, jeans, skirts, vests, jackets, belts, hats. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 1052(f), and the marks were approved. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:49 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark OXZGEN for "[n]on-metal dosing caps for bottles; non-metal dispensing caps for containers," on the ground that applicant's specimens of use (below) failed to show the mark in use with the identified goods. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:59 am
English) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "wine; red wine; rose wine; white wine all of the foregoing being marketed and sold at an associated hotel and related website," in view of the registered marks shown below right, for "wines. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
Supposedly one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:02 am
But that was a nonsequitur because the phrase was not functioning as a mark at all. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:08 am
Wellington) [Section 2(d) refusal of JUST GYDDIUP for "hats; shirts" in view of the registered mark GiddyUp Boots (in standard characters) and the word-plus-design mark shown below, for "boots" [BOOTS disclaimed]. [read post]
12 May 2016, 3:10 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark DIGITAL BOOTH for "metal phone booths. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:17 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:15 am
Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Can size be claimed as a feature of a mark? [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
” Viacom owns marks for SpongeBob SquarePants. [read post]
