Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 9361 - 9380
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
One case which may give some insight into how this may go is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:17 am
Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
See Strayhorn v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
The student might also those distinctive features that gives law a special quality, marking law as different in character from other forms of command, guidelines, or direction. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
Hughes: could compare cases where they narrow the claim of the TM registration v. narrow the claim of the patent—Maker’s Mark case where they have a registration for a wax seal but claim only red. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
(Heckman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am
Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of yesterday’s oral argument in Iancu v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Kansas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:04 am
First up is Perry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
Entertainment Television, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 5:52 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm
Today's opinion in Bond v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
Alavida (Part 3) – when can an earlier common-law or unregistered mark can trump a later registered mark? [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Further, the high recognition factor of the Starbucks marks may make it easier for consumers to realise and understand the use as parody.However, Dumb Starbucks has reproduced Starbucks’ iconic marks in their entirety, in relation to identical goods, in the same product market, for example. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
Six years later, in Walker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
Six years later, in Walker v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
