Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 9361 - 9380 of 16,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Whether an applicant does or doesn’t accept the conditions prior to approval should not matter; the applicant should be free to challenge the conditions in either case. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:31 am by Allison Tussey
The BARNES and JOHNSON cases are related to the pending cases against real estate agent MARK TKAC, 47, of Raleigh, former mortgage broker MARK THOMAS BOWE, 56, of Jonesboro, Georgia, LILLIANA DELIA DEIAC, 43, of Jamaica, New York, and the recently concluded case against closing attorney JEFFERY SCOTT TAGGART, 48, of Winterville. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:54 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 (I recently interviewed Covington & Burling partner Mark Plotkin about CFIUS and other matters for the Lawfare Podcast. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:57 pm by Bexis
(citation and quotation marks omitted).In the end, the strength of the regulatory history won out. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
”   This matter involved the regulatory authority of the Board and the County, not any relief against individual water rights holders. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:41 am by nedaj
Credibility matters in life, but it especially matters for journalists. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:13 am by Laura Dean
In her blue dress with a large gold cross hanging outside of it, she says matter-of-factly that while people are happy when he was elected, they want Mohammed Morsi out because in a year, he hasn’t done anything. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:22 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
” (I didn’t think that topic was really a joking matter, especially given the number of vets in the parade.) [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:20 am by Sean Hayes
Supreme Court Decision 2008Do5897 delivered on January 30, 2009【Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act】 Translation of Official Court Summary  The appearance of a particular singer and the unique actions of others are intangible and variable features close to an impression or image have little function as a fixed mark that differentiates a matter from another matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Rather it appears that what is required is that for the skilled person the value has to be recognisable as a singularity, as in decision T 201/83 within or at the end of a range of possibilities which may mark an end-point for a particular sub-range (cf. decision T 201/83 [8-9]).[18] In the present case […] the description as filed discloses that: “In a more preferred embodiment [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
Any demand that came with a condition concerning non-SEPs would have to be ignored because, even though such a deal may very well be the outcome of negotiations, it constitutes anticompetitive tying.In this case, that means the December 2012 offer doesn't matter. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
For that matter, I hope they didn't make money from his flawed analysis either, now that I think about it. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 3:30 am by Nicole Vinson
It doesn’t matter what state you live in or whether you work for policyholders or insurance companies, safety is priority. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
 First caveat:  “[I]t is relevant that plaintiff does not allege that the data presented in the article were fabricated or fraudulently created. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It failed to distinguish the energy shots from the pills, and its arguments on mark strength and similarity of marks didn’t take the case out of the realm of close calls that could go either way. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am by Robert B. Milligan
This reality provides Companies with a cautionary message: don’t accept the theft of Company documents in violation of Company policies and agreements but tailor your approach to fit the employee’s specific claims and your jurisdiction’s discovery self-help laws. [read post]