Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 9361 - 9380 of 22,036
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by John Floyd
It does not matter if the consumption of alcohol is due a person’s dependency upon alcohol; in other words, that he or she is an alcoholic. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:39 am by Bob Kraft
If you can provide a child with a loving home, it doesn’t matter if you’re their biological parent or not. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
Does a VPN for privacy really matter? [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:45 am by Michelle O'Neil
The law requires the Texas Supreme Court to adopt rules by January 1, 2018 to enforce the law, but it goes into effect on September 1, 2017. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:45 am by Michelle O'Neil
The law requires the Texas Supreme Court to adopt rules by January 1, 2018 to enforce the law, but it goes into effect on September 1, 2017. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:49 am by Matthias Weller
Although the Regulation of the undertaking in Art. 36 EIR recast may be used to facilitate a sale of the assets in a combined set allowing for going concern of the insolvent company, it shows several inconsistencies and flaws: it might be difficult to identify the “known” local creditors in terms of Art. 36 EIR Recast; Art. 36 EIR Recast is discriminating the non-local creditors; pursuant to Art. 36 (5) EIR Recast the rules on majority and voting that apply to the… [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:45 am by freyx89
This is best done by a licensed attorney experienced in disability and Social Security matters. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:40 pm by Robert S. Adler
And it should come as no surprise that, if my colleague’s recommendation were adopted, the strongest and most persistent voices before OIRA would be industry representatives seeking yet another venue to oppose proposed rules. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:20 pm by Joshua A. Stein
  Additionally, Hobby Lobby argued the action should be dismissed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine which, if applied, would hold that the court should not rule on website accessibility issues until DOJ – the expert regulator in this area – first speaks on the issue by promulgating and adopting regulations. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:30 am by Heather Staskiel, Attorney
But under the special Nehmer effective date rules, it does not matter when the VA adds a disease to the presumptive list. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
  But it is odd that the United States, seeking the triumph of the rule of law would unilaterally void practically the only real progress in rule of law articulation in Cuba. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/cKThJBVkbG -> Another One Bites the Dust: No Performance Rights for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings in Illinois https://t.co/xyrD5B8D8T -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-06-13 https://t.co/aa111dVoep -> CJEU rules that The Pirate Bay infringes copyright by making files available to the public https://t.co/PgrD564Xcj -> Judge Overturns 'Jersey Boys' Copyright Verdict https://t.co/JvJWymw1uq -> European court of justice rules Pirate Bay is… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:51 am by Annemarie Bridy
Sanoma Media, the CJEU adopted a controversial rule that site operators with a commercial motive are presumed to have the requisite knowledge.) [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Jordane Reid
  But the Judiciary Committee oversees all matters related to the administration of justice in federal courts and has been active on a number of  litigation reform matters, including most recently class action reform legislation. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 8:45 am by Beverly Milton-Edwards
Inter-generational fissures—among the ruling elite of the GCC as evident in the “Crown Prince” factor—are emerging. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:54 pm by Adam Levitin
 In 2015 the CFPB adopted a new HMDA rule that would expand the number of data fields collected by some 25 fields, effective Jan. 1, 2018. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Rosalind English
Strasbourg law is not clear as to whether residence constitutes such a personal characteristic as a prohibited ground of discrimination – see on the one hand Carson v United Kingdom (2010), which suggests that it is, whereas Magee v United Kingdom (2000) specifically rules out residence within different parts of the UK as a personal characteristic. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 5:14 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
In the present matter, the Court ruled that decedent’s release was not “clearly improper,” so the expert requirement would apply. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:49 am by Guest Contributor
ClientEarth argued that the government was obliged (i) as a matter of procedure to apply to the Commission for an Article 22 Extension, and (ii) as a matter of substance to achieve the 2015 long-stop deadline. [read post]