Search for: "People v. Day" Results 9361 - 9380 of 23,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
Most buses have spaces reserved for wheelchair users these days. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
And Thursday night was an exercise in the people's version of constitutional law. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:06 am by Eugene Volokh
(When I got in touch with the SexOffenderRecord people a few days ago, after seeing the court judgment, they told me that they had never of the case before.) [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  The executive branch of the Federal Government operates its networks on behalf of the American people. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am by SHG
They say 135,000 people listened to the Ninth Circuit’s podcast of the telephone argument in Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:24 pm by Paul Kish
 The High Court’s “fascination” with this statute continues, this time with a case out of Iowa, Dean v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:24 pm by Paul Kish
 The High Court’s “fascination” with this statute continues, this time with a case out of Iowa, Dean v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:24 pm by Paul Kish
 The High Court’s “fascination” with this statute continues, this time with a case out of Iowa, Dean v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
As of today, five people are sanctioned under EO 13611, including former President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:23 am by Steve Erickson
The obvious chief criticism that can be made against current Eight Amendment jurisprudence is the ambiguous nature of the "evolving standards of decency" established in Trop v. [read post]