Search for: "State v. Gaines"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Several states have passed specific laws on the subject. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am
No such right is mentioned expressly in the Constitution, but the Supreme Court has recognized this right since the 1920s, and so far only Justice Scalia has argued that no such right exists (though Justice Thomas has expressly said that he expresses no view on whether it exists).And in Parham v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
A change in the progressivity of a state tax structure promotes migration and changes the allocation of resources within the state. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:43 am
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm
When a financially expert institution learns of facts giving rise to the suspicion of fraud, fidelity to the intent of Congress, and fidelity to plain honesty and decency, require the institution to try to determine the truth -- the expert institution is on inquiry notice because it suspects fraud -- and also require the institution to report the unhappy facts to government agencies charged with maintaining honesty in investments -- the SEC, FINRA and state securities commissions -- so that… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
These are real risks which have to be weighed against the benefits of self-regulation including independence from the state and the application of valuable expertise and experience to the realities of practice. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
The complaint seeks injunctive relief, conduct-based injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus interest, and penalties. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
Since the 1970's when the Supreme Court of the United States decided that lawyers could advertise (Bates v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 11:47 am
Now that the Republicans have gained control of the House and Senate, some believe that the reintroduction and passage of HR 9495 is inevitable absent a huge public outcry or a Democrat filibuster. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
Blockchain v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
At one point, the Deputy Minister tells the Agent that he will “keep him in the loop” about other bids and states that the last bidder might have “certain advantages. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
In the landmark decision SEC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
