Search for: "State v. House"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 28,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Plus this interpretation has the weight of precedent: EFF successfully argued in Apple v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
" At a White House briefing, press secretary Dana Perino said President Bush was disappointed with the decision, but "we respect the court's decision and will abide by it. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 12:53 pm
In Harper v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:00 am
Paul v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:06 pm
Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
For more on Dockery v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:30 am
They may only charge their costs for disclosing this information, costs that the Court stated were likely to be negligible. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
In People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Construction Employees v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
That is the threat posed by state power in our century. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm
The truth was; the houses were never offered for sale for £350,000 (or anything approaching that), Redrow had tried but been unable to sell the houses to registered providers for affordable housing. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Lord Sumption also rejected the approaches taken at first instance and by the Court of Appeal in holding that the defence of illegality was a rule of law and that previous attempts to introduce a discretionary element into the doctrine had been expressly rejected by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
Frenkel, then a Cisco in-house lawyer blogging anonymously as the Patent Troll Tracker, wrote two posts about the case, ESN v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
There is no exemption for severely disabled children whose disability prevents them from sharing.The Prime Minister was almost certainly referring to the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip, Trengove and Gorry v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2). [read post]
