Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 11,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Interlocutory appeal for medical residents at state hospitals (two cases) Geoffrey Klein, M.D. and Baylor College of Medicine v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:20 am
” Baures v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:30 am
Without a State budget in place, the City was forced to make assumptions in the Executive Budget on the amount of tax dollars the State will return to the City - the Executive Budget assumes a State Budget that reduces the amount of tax dollars the State returns to City by $1.3 billion. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:01 am
CNRV, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:24 am
In State v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:51 am
Part of the New York City Parks department system, the pool is huge – 300 feet long and 165 feet wide, holding up to 1,000 swimmers. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
Chemerisnky – United States v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:06 am
The case, decided in 1999, is styled, Mid-Century Insurance Company of Texas, a division of The Farmers Insurance Group of Companies, v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
I have been absolutely swamped at work so it's been a little difficult to find time to analyze the Salazar v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:41 am
No. 97 v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:25 am
A ruckus ensued when Tharaldson Development Company wanted to rezone a 3.6 acre parking lot so that an hotel could be constructed. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:27 pm
V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:22 pm
V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:16 pm
V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:06 pm
KERRIDGE V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:56 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:04 am
Rather, they care about whether the state court that said the state judge didn't abuse his discretion was itself grossly wrong.You could park an army in the space between that degree of wrongness and getting it right.Still aren't sure? [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am
., v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
Last week the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decided United States v. [read post]