Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 13,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re writes that in Kansas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
See Herbko Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
The mark was registered in April 2003. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:02 am
Pirani v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:10 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
The Department of Justice response to the public comments were published at 77 Federal Register 44271, July 27, 2012. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:00 am
As the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently noted in Bruce Munro and Bruce Munro Studio v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
See Zuffa, LLC v. theultimatefighter.com, Case No. 10-cv-00582 (D. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
The cases appear to be the first of their kind relating to the purchase of shares in the pre-IPO market.In the federal court case, SEC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:39 am
L., et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
Today the General Court held otherwise after a successful appeal by Tilda from the Board of Appeal decision: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd v OHIM (T304/09). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:12 am
In Jones, the government had obtained a search warrant to install a tracking device on a vehicle registered to the suspect's wife. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
Can the state forfeit her Cadillac Escalade, which she registered under the false name? [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
Gutman’s use of the Designer’s Name, its registered trademarks, or similar variations in commerce to promote other products or to promote Ms. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:45 pm
IndiaQayoom v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Therefore, Viatek has not stated a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act and this counterclaim is dismissed. * Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
§ 78dd-3, which states: § 78dd–3. [read post]
