Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 13,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
And unkind reader of the evolving dispute over the Louboutin red sole trade mark in the United States might be forgiven for saying that murky rules of unclear application are found there too. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:20 am
Compulsory insurance TypeAnnual premium in Euros Tractor unit1198.98 Trailer54.19 V. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 4:01 pm
" Doe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
Regarding the necessary security, Section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes states that every vehicle required to be registered in the state must have security in the form of an insurance policy or other authorized method. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
These are companies that are organized to staff the Funds marketed as Fidelity Investments and registered with the SEC. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:46 am
” When the Supreme Court hears arguments in Elgin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
K-Beech, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The transfer of ownership was registered by the EPO with effect from February 10, 2007. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
488/10 Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional SA v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos SL, all the way from sunny Spain, from the unforgettably-named Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 1 de Alicante y n° 1 de Marca Comunitaria [Merpel has Spanish friends with very long names; she suspects that this is just the court's pet name and that its real name is about three times longer]. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
In an op-ed in the Washington Post, George Will urges the Court to grant cert. in Harmon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
’This morning the Advocate General answered all this questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered [that's presumably good news for Wintersteiger, which has… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
M & T Bank Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm
” Giblin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:48 pm
If you want China trademark protection, you must register the trademark in China. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:52 pm
Bidder’s Edge and Register v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:37 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm
The facility registering the activity would be required to operate according to rules established in regulations. [read post]
