Search for: "State v. State" Results 9361 - 9380 of 258,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
This time, Russeau argued it under state law grounds, but he failed to preserve error.Daubert hearing. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:37 am by Nicholas Stephanopoulos
The comment explores whether plaintiffs might be able… Continue reading The post “Arkansas State Conference NAACP v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 2:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Over at the Lawfare blog, Sonia McNeil (a student at Harvard Law School who assists me with the Book Review there) sums up the issues surrounding the Stolen Valor Act and last Wednesday’s oral argument in the related case of United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:27 am by Shea Denning
Jeff wrote earlier this week about the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:47 am by tracey
Regina (Garland) v Secretary of State for Justice and another: [2011] EWCA Civ 1335;  [2011] WLR (D)  333 “Under rule 53(1) of the Prison Rules 1999 prison authorities were allowed a full 48 hours from discovery of an offence against discipline to lay a charge against a prisoner, and longer where there were exceptional circumstances making it impossible to lay the charge within that time.” WLR Daily, 17th November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) A few weeks ago, I participated on a panel about United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:48 am
But imagine my joy when I saw that the new published NMCCA opinion was in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by tracey
MM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 135;  [2012] WLR (D)  36 ” ‘Conspicuous unfairness’ was not a free standing ground in an immigration case on which a court could act in the absence of unlawful action on the part of the Home Secretary.” WLR Daily, 24th January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:46 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, the Fourth Amendment case on the scope of the exclusionary rule that I’ll be arguing. [read post]