Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 9361 - 9380 of 10,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2011, 9:45 am by Steve McConnell
But recently the Middle District of Tennessee rode to the rescue and delivered a useful opinion in a pain pump case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:37 am by Katherine Macfarlane
The chain of events leading to the reasonable accommodation denial in Oross v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:19 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Writing for a majority of the Supreme Court, Justice Stevens rejected this claim as, among other things, lacking basis in the record. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm by David
Stevens, I feel that this post is timely. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:58 am by Jonathan Zasloff
Political scientist Steven Teles has argued, with a good deal of force, that much American government has become a “kludgeocracy,” where a substantial amount of all American public policy relies on kludges. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The government, relying on the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Kleindienst v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 5:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wollman and were joined in full by Circuit Judges Steven M. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:23 am by WSLL
CiteID=464186Appeal from the District Court of Big Horn County, Honorable Steven R. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:09 am by Tom Goldstein
  He wrote the most on-point opinion, Garcetti v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 am by SHG
  The potential was made clear when Doug Berman's Sentencing Law & Policy was cited in a footnote to Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent in U.S. v. [read post]