Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 9361 - 9380 of 11,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 11:14 am
 They filed a complaint in California state court against Diamond International Corporation on December 22, 2008. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:19 am by Mandelman
Here’s a January 2010 quote from a California newspaper writing about the prevalence of lawyers scamming homeowners at risk of foreclosure: As of mid-January, the State Bar had resignations from 13 lawyers, and three trials were pending at the State Bar Court, Layton said. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:07 am by David P. Schwarz
That, in turn, raises the question of whether a gay couple can be granted a divorce in a state which is now legally barred from recognizing their marriage. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:25 am
Check with your state or local bar association to find out if the program has been implemented in your state. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:41 am by Russell Jackson
  The fraud prong of their UCL claim was barred for lack of standing, the court concluded, citing In re Tobacco II Cases. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
For the first time in our nation's history, three women will be sitting together on the bench of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:58 pm by lawmrh
The other 9 include court or state attorneys, court staff, two public fiduciaries and a private licensed fiduciary as well as a child welfare administrator, and a state bar representative. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
“When A Speech Code Is A Speech Code: The Stanford Policy and the Theory of Incidental Restraints,” University of California at Davis Law Review. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:43 am
Baldwin began to work for CAA and sued IMG in federal district court in California to void the clause in his contract barring him for two years from soliciting IMG clients he had represented. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Morel (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google – Google asks California judge to declare that it is not liable for copyright infringement, simply by linking to copyright-infringing works on RapidShare (1709 Copyright Blog) Universal Music Group – Amici urge 9th Circuit to reverse UMG v Veoh case; RIAA, NBCU, PROs and WLF weigh in (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia dismisses Rosetta… [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:24 pm by Michelle Gee
In response to the latest Arizona law, and other state's immigration laws, once complete border control is established state and local governments would be barred from enacting their own immigration laws. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:57 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas) Petition for certiorari Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Victoria VanBuren
  However, the Court appears to recognize that there are other ways of demonstrating intent, as through reference to state law, arbitral rules, etc. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The complaint as filed alleged false designation of origin under §43(a)(1)(A), trademark dilution under §43(c), infringement of the California right of publicity, false advertising under §43(a)(1)(B), and California unfair competition/false and misleading advertising claims. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:10 am by Mitch Jackson
 J&W is also listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers, an exclusive listing reserved for the best law firms in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  The Court has already granted cert. for next year involving a California law that prohibits the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]