Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
For the jury to have found Katakis guilty of obstruction of justice, it had to find that the government proved each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:[1] that defendant Katakis knowingly altered, destroyed, or concealed electronic records or documents; [2] that defendant Katakis acted with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence an investigation that he either knew of or contemplated; and [3] that the investigation was about a matter by or within the jurisdiction of the… [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) v. the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:43 am
There are several thousand Risperdal Gynecomastia lawsuits pending in California state court. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:14 am
The basic framework was set out by the Supreme Court last year in the case of Walker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm
Microsoft had an interesting choice of law clause in its Xbox 360 warranty: If you acquired the Xbox Product in the United States, the laws of the State of Washington, U.S.A., will apply to this Limited Warranty. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Paragraphs 7-10 of the Complaint say Madsen, Dougherty, Hillman and Grives (i) are “United States citizen[s] and resident[s] of the State of California” and (ii) were, at “all times relevant” to the claims in the Complaint, “supervisory employee[s] of . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
(Tangible IP) Ireland Irish ISP and major music labels ready to disconnect pirates (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) Sweden Hollywood lands triple strike on Pirate Bay, OpenBitTorrent (TorrentFreak) Switzerland Free speech: trade mark rights 6:0 (Class 46) United Kingdom Law firm asks alleged file-sharers to incriminate themselves (TorrentFreak) United States US General District appeals court rules customers of company who misappropriate… [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 5:22 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California made it sound in her judgment as if Epic could only have debunked Apple's security pretext if it had proved the complete uselessness of human app review. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:04 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
The case concerns a 2005 California ban adopted by state lawmakers. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:19 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:18 am
Let's just say the documentation around CTA's receipt of AutoCAD seemed murky. 9th Circuit cases: As far as applicable Ninth Circuit precedent, the court found an answer favorable to Vernor in United States v. [read post]
