Search for: ""duty to warn"" Results 921 - 940 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 5:03 pm by CaliforniaInsuranceDefense
Recently, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in San Diego held that an insurance broker, Aon, who placed an OCIP covering a construction project had no legal duty to warn a subcontractor covered under the OCIP issued by Legion, which insurer became insolvent—even though the insurance broker learned that Legion was insolvent before the subcontractor work was completed. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:50 am
Contractors have a duty to warn workers about potential construction hazards and take proper safety precautions to ensure a reasonable level of safety. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:11 pm by David Oliver
  This duty to warn and the accompanying threat of liability will inevitably influence a manufacturer's choice whether to use that particular design. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by McDonald Provosty
This duty also includes an ancillary duty to warn invitees of any dangerous conditions not readily apparent which the owner knew, or should have known, and a concomitant duty to conduct reasonable inspections to discover dangerous conditions existing on the premises. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:01 pm
All physicians have a duty to warn patients about potential problems with treatment so patients can make informed decisions. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm by Walter Olson
[Tyler Cowen and Kevin Grier, Grantland, via Ilya Somin] Tags: football, sports Related posts Duty to warn that wearing football gear might make you really hot (13) Benched for Your Own Good (1) “It’s not like I sue him every day” (1) Youth football league needn’t re-weigh 11-year-old (0) Yosemite rock-climber’s survivors sue (0) [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
However, just as tobacco manufacturers are required to provide information about health risks on their packaging, manufacturers of other potentially dangerous products have a duty to warn consumers that the product could harm them. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:55 am by Carrie Lin
  In so doing, the Court re-affirmed the general rules that a manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable for defects in another entity’s product, and that a manufacturer has no duty to warn of risks arising from another manufacturer’s products. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
When at sea, cruise lines have the duty to warn passengers from bad weather as soon as the dangers become known. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:11 am by Sean Wajert
  Second, plaintiffs argued that defendants had a duty to warn of the hazards posed by the foreseeable uses of their products. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
Moreover, defendants “had no duty to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers’ products. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
Moreover, defendants “had no duty to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers’ products. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by Frances Zacher
In this unremarkable decision, however, is a reminder about the law regarding warnings and prescription drugs:  “Prescription drug manufacturers have a duty to warn the patient’s doctor of the dangers involved with their product rather than warn the patient directly. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:01 am by Dianne Saxe
The plaintiffs had won, at trial, on the ground of duty to warn. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  Padilla (discussed here) actually went further, holding that counsel was required to do more than simply refrain from giving the wrong advice:  he had a duty to warn his client of the possibility that there might be immigration consequences. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
It also charges the manufacturer of the boat, Chaparral, with a defect in design and breach of the duty to warn. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:15 am by Sean Wajert
Such an expanded duty could also undermine consumer safety by inundating users with excessive warnings. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:47 am by Bexis
“[R]ecognition of such a duty could lead to an overabundance of potentially conflicting product warnings. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:28 am by Russell Jackson
The California Supreme Court similarly rejected any duty to warn about dangers inherent in somebody else's products: Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards in their products. [read post]