Search for: "3-Point Products, Inc." Results 921 - 940 of 4,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Enacting a 3 year law as Title II might be the best option, even 50 years late. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
To illustrate the point, he offers the example of an employer who excludes identical twins/same-sex siblings from a job so that the employer is treating a man with an identical twin (or non-identical brother) differently from a woman with the exact same male sibling. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm by News Desk
Thibodeaux of Organix Industries, Inc. dba Plant Organix. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Canopy Growth engages in the production, distribution, and sales of cannabis products in Canada. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The question was at what point do these rentals become a commercial use of land. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm by Anthony Zaller
Merchant Exchange Productions, Inc., the California Court of Appeals held that a mandatory service charge could potentially be found to be a gratuity that must be distributed to service employees. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm by Anthony Zaller
Merchant Exchange Productions, Inc., the California Court of Appeals held that a mandatory service charge could potentially be found to be a gratuity that must be distributed to service employees. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
 Permakat Eleonora Rosati wrote about Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc, an important High Court of England and Wales "test case" about infringement of copyright in sound recordings under section 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
 Under Schedule 3 paragraph 4(2)(b) of the TMA 1994, it is set out that:“(2) it is not an infringement of — [...] [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
The Supreme Court held 9-0, Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas and all joining in Justice Breyer’s opinion that such union paid workers could not be dismissed or disciplined for union activity.(4) But the point here is that never once did the employer insist that such workers were disloyal because they moonlighted for another employer, i.e. in this case the union. [read post]