Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:20 am
I have twice blogged about court orders coming out of the United States District of Arizona Court’s Barten v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
The FCC was convinced that e-readers in their present state are not designed and marketed for their ACS features and thus may be entitled to a waiver. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:29 am
Greenaway of the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit wrote in the opinion that in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:09 am
As to whether it is necessary to put these issues on trial, I have previously questioned whether the AC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
- AC has replied on January 8, 2014 to Prof. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:56 am
Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied WMC’s motion to reconsider the denial of its motion to dismiss in light of the intervening New York state appellate decision in ACE Securities v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
Contour Hardening indicates that it is the owner of United States Registration No. 3,124,014 for the trademark REAL POWER for providing AC generators. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
There’s something particularly remarkable about NLRB v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and… [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 3:18 pm
Should AC be permitted, at this very late state, to consolidate the 2014 – 2017 tariff hearings with the 2010-2017 process, even though the former arguably raise significant new factual and legal issues? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:57 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
