Search for: "Ali v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:00 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Anyway, that combined with Bexis having to fly to the west coast for the ALI annual meeting, kept us from posting until now.Here's the post we were planning on uploading yesterday. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
In the case of Nasib Ali v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:48 pm
This has elicited the usual philosophical responses, none more eloquent than our own Supreme Court in AG v O’Brien, that such policies ‘involve the State in moral defilement’. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Such products, the ALI recognized, were “especially common” in the context of prescription drugs:There are some products which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite incapable of being made safe for their intended and ordinary use. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
Another is U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
Dreamwell, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:20 am
United States, No. 97-334C (Jan. 29, 2010), the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
This is most explicit in Johnston v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
".... ...As this Court explained in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am
In Gur Narain Das & Anr. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:44 pm
Bush and Munaf v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm
I believe, if my sources are correct, that this is United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
(Delighted to welcome back IntLawGrrls alumna Pamela Merchant, who contributes this guest post) I am pleased to update you on a recent development in Yousuf v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:07 pm
The Supreme Court of India ruled last week in Ali v. [read post]
