Search for: "Anderson v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
" That was the headline from columnists Jack Anderson and Dale Van Atta in Washington Post on January 15, 1986. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:33 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Young's legal representative, Michael Anderson of Anderson & Loeb, scoffed at the countersuit. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
Steve Vladeck’s comments added to this by pointing to a series of recently decided or argued cases on contractor liability, included the lesser noticed United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am by Ben
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office)   United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday)   US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Anderson, which rejected a claim brought by state voters under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
  Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]