Search for: "Andrews v. United States"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,675
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2022, 1:56 pm
Esti Tambay and Sarah Yager argue that amid bipartisan support of the proposed Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act—which would give the United States the ability to prosecute suspected war criminals discovered within U.S. borders regardless of nationality—Congress must work to close other loopholes to promote justice for international crimes. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:59 pm
For instance, instead of saying, “Product of the United States,” a label for Category A meat will now read, “Born, Raised, and Slaughtered in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
As Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Houman Fakhimi understands, embezzlement, under Coliseum case widens; six are charged, By Andrew Blankstein, Paul Pringle and Rong-Gong Lin II, Los Angeles Times More Blog Entries: United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
"Any search conducted pursuant to such warrant is the equivalent of a warrantless search," Judge Pratt wrote Monday in his 19-page order in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:48 am
Supreme Court oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:54 am
The court prohibited defense counsel from discussing the testimony with his client.In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The Court’s most recent federal Indian law decision, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am
” Briefly: At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports on the upcoming term’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
Hazel, Michael V. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Ahlering and Andrew R. [read post]
In a dispute over the meaning of a procedural rule, justices seem settled: “Mistake” means “mistake”
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am
United States was an unusual argument, as the justices seemed to come to the bench resolved to settle the case with an answer proposed by neither of the parties. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
This requirement is consistent with the limitation imposed upon state-taxpayer standing in federal courts in Doremus v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:51 am
In the following case, the major issue was over communications from injured seaman Andrew Perry’s Jones Act attorney to Sea Subs, owner of the M/V Sea Sub III. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Congress, having referred to the first amendment and stated that it is “necessary to promote the vigorous dialogue necessary to shape public policy in a representative democracy” went on to note that: “some persons are obstructing the free expression rights of United States authors and publishers, and in turn chilling the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States interest of the citizenry in receiving information on… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The United States also argues that the mandate is necessary and proper to carry out the law's insurance reforms. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
The en banc decision of the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”) in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
This is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
This is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
