Search for: "B. J. K." Results 921 - 940 of 2,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 5:51 pm
A person who, with intent to cause a condition of intoxication, euphoria, excitement, exhilaration, stupefaction, or dulling of the senses, ingests or inhales the fumes of: (1) model glue; or(2) a substance that contains:            (A) toluene;            (B) acetone;            (C)… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Daniel Schwartz
Sec. 46a-60(b)(7), though it is to be read in conjunction with the state’s broad anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this examination appeal case Board 3.3.09 had a lot to say on R 164 (a new version of which, as you know, will enter into force on November 1, 2014).The PCT application had been filed with the Japanese Patent Office (JPO). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 2010.Business LawKF1659 .M36 2010Business buyout agreements : plan now for retirement, death, divorce or owner disagreements / by Anthony Mancuso & Bethany K. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, June 14, 2019 Tags: Capital markets, Exchange-traded funds, Index funds, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Liquidity, Market conditions, SEC, Transparency Investors Bancorp‘s Impact on Long-Term Incentive Plans Posted by Matthew B. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”R 99(2) provides that “In the statement of grounds of appeal the appellants shall indicate the reasons for setting aside the decision impugned, or the extent to which it is to be amended and the facts and evidence on which the appeal is based”.R 101(1) provides that “If the appeal does not comply with A 106 to A 108, R 97 or R 99, paragraph 1(b) or (c) or paragraph 2, the Board of Appeal shall reject it as inadmissible”.[2.1.2] As to the content of… [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Second, defendants F, G, H, I, J and K established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the fifth and seventh causes of action on the ground of judicial immunity. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:40 am by GJEL Staff
These ballot measures include: • AC Transit: Measure C1 ($600 million over 20 years) • BART: Measure RR ($3.5 billion over 48 years) • Contra Costa County: Measure X ($2.8 billion over 30 years) • Humboldt County: Measure U ($200 million over 20 years) • Los Angeles County: Measure M ($120 billion over 40 years – indefinite duration) • Monterey County: Measure X (600 million over 30 years) • Oakland: Measure K ($350 million) • Placer County:… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:51 pm
A former sergeant at the jail, Mark B. [read post]