Search for: "BE v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 258,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 12:23 pm by Staff
Not Guilty / Complete Acquittal State V. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:09 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This article addresses judicial choices and errors involved in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kayla Campbell
  « Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:06 am by traceydennis
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (Zimbabwe) v Same; AM (Zimbabwe) v Same; DM (Zimbabwe) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 1285; [2010] WLR (D) 295 “A claim for asylum would not be defeated if the tribunal found that a claimant would be willing to lie about political beliefs, or about the absence of political beliefs, but that the reason for the lie was to avoid persecution. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:56 am by traceydennis
HH (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; AM (Somalia) v Same; J (Somalia) v Same; MA (Somalia) v Same; [2010] EWCA Civ 42; ; [2010] WLR (D) 107 “Where the route and manner of return of an illegal immigrant to a safe haven were known or could be implied, the first tier tribunal had to consider whether the claimant would be put at risk if returned by that route. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:31 am by traceydennis
HJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HT v Same ú [2010] UKSC 31; [2010] WLR (D) 174 “To reject a gay person’s claim for refugee status on the ground that, if returned to his home country, he could avoid persecution by living discreetly would be to deny his right, protected by the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, to live freely and openly as himself without fear of persecution. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:48 am by sally
Regina (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (MM (Burma)) v Same [2010] UKSC 36; [2010] WLR (D) 203 “An asylum seeker who made a new application for asylum after his original application for asylum had finally failed, was entitled to the benefits conferred by the European Directive setting minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers. [read post]