Search for: "Baker v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 7:21 am
See, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am
” Briefly: At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Packingham v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:13 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in Department of Commerce et. al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:20 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Grider (07-95), on the duty of one state to respect the case law of another state interpreting that other state’s law bearing upon creation of a nationwide class for civil litigation. ** Cincinnati v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:55 am
In today’s case (Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:11 pm
" United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 12:52 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) P.R.A. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:33 pm
In Koricic v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:22 am
John Tuohy of the Indianapolis Star writes today about the Court of Appeals ruling April 30th in the case of Indiana State Board of Education v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am
Sharon Bradford Franklin explained how United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court upheld the free speech rights of state and local public-sector workers in Janus v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:33 am
Supreme Court applying this right to state-level criminal proceedings in the 1963 case of Gideon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s 1857 Dynes v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
This power, though, was never exercised and was ultimately seized by the Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 10:09 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Paul Winters v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
What I'm really looking for in Salazar is the question of whether Justice O'Connor's "Endorsement Test" is still viable or whether a minimum of five justices affirmatively stated that they were abandoning that approach adopted by a majority of the Supreme Court in Doe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
