Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 6:59 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The Court of Appeal in the Fourth Appellate District, Division Two in Riverside just filed its opinion in City of Riverside v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
Galvan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
” Lawyers v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
In August, a court in Dusseldorf, Germany temporarily halted sales of Galaxy 10.1 tablets, while a court in The Hague banned sales of the South Korean company’s Galaxy S, S II smart phones.According to the district court, Apple failed to allege sufficient facts to meet Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard in support of its Sherman Act monopolization claim. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:06 pm
Samsung v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
Walker In the third quarter of 2011, the California Supreme Court issued two CEQA opinions and the California Appellate Courts issued 12 CEQA opinions. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am
Global Global – General Guidelines for securing open source software (EFF) Global – Copyright A game we all win: Dumping DRM can increase sales while reducing piracy (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (Michael Geist) PK In the Know podcast (Microsoft deal to get TV on your Xbox, ACTA review etc) (Public Knowledge) Anti-piracy company pirates Deus Ex in controversial experiment (TorrentFreak) iCopyright article tools for WordPress (PlagiarismToday) Global –… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
California, 10-1231). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:37 am
Concepcion, the Court struck down 5-to-4 a California rule of law that stopped corporations from banning class actions against them for cheating large numbers of people out of individually small amounts of money. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
He said, "By striking down the Port's unjustified ban on owner-operators, the Court has upheld the rights of trucking companies to structure their businesses to maximize efficiency and productivity. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In the case of AT & T Mobility v Concepcion, the Supreme Court ruled that a California's prohibition of allowing corporations to waive class action lawsuit rights was trumped by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:52 am
The Ninth Circuit held the arbitration clause unenforceable on the ground that the class action ban was unconscionable under a California Supreme Court precedent, Discover Bank. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
. – In a press release dated the same day as the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:02 pm
Lee v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:50 pm
That’s why it was so odd to see the Pacific Legal Foundation advocating for more prolix environmental review in Save the Plastic Bag v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Insight Communications Company, L.P. [read post]
