Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 14,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2010, 8:58 pm
Chicago, holding that the Second Amendment's individual right to keep and bear arms for self defense (subject to reasonable regulation) applies to the states as well as the federal government. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
But some quick research turned up Idaho Coalition for Bears v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Moll v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:43 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V concerns capital punishment. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
Like in other states, the label “trust” is applied to entities that bear little resemblance to the traditional trust. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Kansas will be voting on whether to restore the individual right to keep and bear arms to state constitution, undoing the judicial nullification in Salina v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:58 am
In Derringer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
The petition and appeal are dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its costs.[...]. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:37 am
(Some states do require them depending on the total number of hours worked; mine, however, does not.) [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:14 pm
Lest any of you think that who bears the burden of proof doesn't really matter, take heed of the recent decision in Chow v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:58 am
Several weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Dynamic Drinkware v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
Russell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
Nearly seven decades ago, the Supreme Court analyzed the meaning of these words: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 5:35 pm
Cole v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 8:24 pm
He argues that the trial court violated his state and federal constitutional rights by requiring him and his wife to bear the burden of proof to terminate the guardianship. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
On June 28, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided McDonald v. [read post]
