Search for: "Bell v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 1,375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 7:55 am by Alain Leibman
Yet, courts consistently allow such testimony, as evidenced in the recent Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:55 am by Alain Leibman
Yet, courts consistently allow such testimony, as evidenced in the recent Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Not a fact in sight.We've known for over a year now that under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That did not happen in the United States, and the authors provide some insight into why. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  That has the advantage of creating a direct circuit split over the extent of PMA preemption, and direct circuit splits are one thing upon which successful United States Supreme Court appeals are based.But on TwIqbal, what Bausch is conceptually worse than just disagreeing with a decision we like. [read post]
May 14, 2010)(O'Neill) (civil forfeiture case, truck driver failed to show entitlement to money hidden in truck and unclaimed byowner)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00158-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court [pdf]View E-Briefs in No. 08-0465 THE… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As Douglas J., dissenting in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm by Anthony Colleluori
Diane Petillo has the honor of posting our 100th post:And now for an update on a previous post in the case ofCave v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Aaron Weems
  Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:32 am by Alex Basilevsky
This determination may well prove to be the opening bell for the serious regulation of greenhouse gases in the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On November 6, in a not for publication opinion, Judge White found that the second amended complaint was also deficient under the standards set forth in the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]